Usuais atividades website de uma grande mineradora Hashocean Bitcoin estão longe de ser encontrada, alimentando sugestões de que o cloudminer é uma farsa.

Hashocean para Trilogy de outra Oceano

De acordo com " Is It Down Right Now ", que monitora o status de páginas favoritas da web e verifica se eles estão para baixo ou não usando a ferramenta de teste a seguir, bem como gráficos e comentários dos usuários, Hashocean foi para baixo por mais de cinco dias.

Uma visita ao Hashocean  website mostra a mensagem "403 Forbidden cloudflare-nginx '. "Hashocean.com está estacionado", "Is It Down Right Now", diz. "O site expire ou seja listado para a venda ..." Como no momento desta publicação, ele diz que o site Hashocean foi para baixo por cerca de 5 dias e 19 horas. Seus YouTube  e Facebook  páginas também foram removidos.

Agora, com base no pressuposto de que o mineiro desapareceu com o dinheiro investido por seus assinantes - teria cerca de 700.000 deles, vários comentários têm arrastou súbito desaparecimento de Hashocean.

vista dos assinantes

OrionOverwatch escreve sobre Reddit:

"Eu calculei quanto dinheiro eles fugiram com. Eles pagam por volta de 1900 Bitcoins todos os dias durante o último par de dias e receberam cerca de 2200 por dia, com exceção de ontem que é provavelmente porque eles fecharam. Olhando para os diferentes datas e fazer uma estimativa aproximada é muito fácil de descobrir que ganhavam em média cerca de 140 Bitcoins por dia durante cerca de 20 meses, o que seria um 50M cool $. (É provavelmente cerca de 35M $ e 65M $). Eles provavelmente vai vender um pequeno número de Bitcoins a cada dia que obviamente vai fazer o preço por Bitcoin diminuir significativamente durante os próximos dias, meses ou mesmo anos. Tipo de um parecer pessimista, mas um realista ".

Spoonfednonsense diz:

"Sim, eu perdi 1,75 Bitcoin mim. Viu-o vir com a redução para metade chegando. Eu até sabia que era um esquema de Ponzi (um tolo e seu dinheiro são facilmente se separaram, é a lição que aprendi com este. "

Outra postou um link para o relatório  sobre os detalhes de registro de domínio do site que citam Richard Maisano como seu proprietário e que procuram para obter o problema relatado às autoridades competentes.

No entanto, apesar da visão pessimista a ele, alguns ainda estão esperançosos.

Johann Steynberg em seu comentário sobre www.isitdownrightnow.com, escreve em resposta a outro comentário que sugeriu através de uma ligação  que o mineiro vai voltar em breve:

"Obrigado. Vamos esperar e ver o que acontece quando o novo ciclo de pagamento é devido. Só então seremos capazes de saber com certeza. "

Você Procura uma alternativa confiável para HashOcean?

Aqui esta uma que tem tudo para dominar o mercado.

Usual website activities of a major Bitcoin miner Hashocean are nowhere to be found, fuelling suggestions that the cloudminer is a scam.

Hashocean to another Ocean’s Trilogy

According to ‘Is It Down Right Now’ which monitors the status of favorite web sites and checks whether they are down or not using the test tool below, as well as graphs and users’ comments, Hashocean has been down for more than five days.

A visit to the Hashocean website shows the ‘403 Forbidden cloudflare-nginx’ message. “Hashocean.com is PARKED,” "Is It Down Right Now" says. “The website is either expired or listed for sale...” As at the time of this publication, it says the Hashocean site has been down for about 5 days 19 hours. Its youtube and Facebook pages have also been removed.

Now, based on the assumption that the miner has disappeared with the money invested by its subscribers - reportedly about 700,000 of them, several comments have trailed Hashocean’s sudden disappearance.

Subscribers’ views

OrionOverwatch writes on Reddit:

“I calculated how much money they ran away with. They pay around 1900 Bitcoins every single day during the last couple of days and they received about 2200 a day, except from yesterday which is probably why they shut down. Looking at the different dates and making a rough estimation it's pretty easy to find out they earned on average about 140 Bitcoins a day during roughly 20 months which would be a cool 50M$. (it's probably around 35M$ and 65M$). They will probably sell a small number of the Bitcoins every day which will obviously make the price per Bitcoin decrease significantly during the next days, months or even years. Kind of a pessimistic opinion but a realistic one.”

Spoonfednonsense says:

“Yeah I lost 1.75 Bitcoin myself. Saw it coming with the Halving coming up. I even knew it was a Ponzi scheme (a fool and his money are easily parted, is the lesson I learned from this one.”

Another posted a link to the report on the site’s domain registration details which cite Richard Maisano as its owner and seeking to get the issue reported to the relevant authorities.

However, despite the gloomy view to it, some are still hopeful.

Johann Steynberg in his comment on www.isitdownrightnow.com, writes in response to another comment which suggested through a link that the miner will be back soon:

“Thank you. Let's wait and see what happens when the new payment run is due. Only then will we be able to know for sure.”

Looking For One HashOcean Alternative? Dont Horry! Click Here.

Enquanto o mundo FinTech ainda está para ver as implicações do corte DAO e Brexit, CoinTelegraph participaram MoneyConf em Madrid para recolher opiniões de especialistas sobre o futuro do dinheiro. -Nos entre os keynotes inspirados e os painéis de discussões instigantes CoinTelegraph tive uma conversa com Darrel MacMullin , CEO da BitGold.

MoneyConf é um evento somente para convidados organizados por especialistas por trás Web Summit, crescimento mais rápido evento de tecnologia do mundo, e incidiu sobre o futuro das finanças. Este ano, mais de 1500 decisores de toda a indústria, incluindo mais de 100 startups expositoras olhando para revolucionar a indústria chegou a ensolarada Madrid.

Desafios de moedas digitais

MacMullin diz CoinTelegraph sobre o ataque DAO:

"É emocionante ver o que está acontecendo com diferentes cryptocurrencies. A situação em torno do corte DAO e como isso é sério, é ainda pouco claro. Muitos sistemas convencionais têm sido invadido várias vezes. Tomemos, por exemplo, o sistema Swift, que foi cortado algumas vezes no ano passado. A maior preocupação aqui é, claro, a reputação e ganhando de confiança, se você está tentando construir uma moeda e fazer as pessoas usá-lo como moeda principal tornando-os investir nela ".

O fato de que no caso de moedas digitais você está lidando com contabilidade apenas o sinal digital e digital é bastante desafiador. Qualquer ataque ao razão é, portanto, colocar todo o sistema em grande risco. A outra desvantagem de moedas digitais, como mencionado por Darrell, é que todas as transações são anônimos que torna difícil para resolver o problema se algo der errado.



circuito fechado de contabilidade privada

BitGold oferece uma plataforma para compra, venda ou ouro redentor usando a tecnologia de pagamento e liquidação Aurum de BitGold.

MacMullin explica:

"No BitGold e GoldMoney , uma das vantagens que temos é que estamos a lidar com o ouro físico. Nós construímos um livro digital e é um livro privada circuito fechado. Mesmo se tivéssemos de ser hackeado o nosso sistema tem uma capacidade de reverter todos os caminhos. Mesmo se alguém era para entrar e mexer com o razão ainda temos todo o ouro físico. "

A contabilidade está sendo feito backup constantemente e cada vez que alguém compra ouro usando a plataforma BitGold um código de barras serializado especial é dedicado a ele.

De acordo com MacMullin, o sistema é altamente seguro e é quase impossível cortá-lo, "a menos que haja um ataque físico simultânea junto com o ataque digital no livro, mas é muito improvável", diz ele.

Ethereum vs Bitcoin

Havia uma opinião que Ethereum irá substituir Bitcoin, porém o ataque DAO tem causado algumas dúvidas sobre o futuro da Ethereum e sua capacidade para assumir uma posição de liderança.

MacMullin compartilha sua visão:

"Eu não acho que este ataque vai pôr fim a Ethereum. É sem dúvida um golpe na confiança, no entanto, penso que a comunidade por trás Ethereum respondeu mais do que corretamente -. Eles estão ficando atrás dela tentando resolver o problema e colocar Ethereum no lugar "

Em sua opinião, a corrida entre Ethereum e Bitcoin não é sobre um substituindo o outro. Ambas as moedas têm as suas comunidades de apoio, que são bastante grande, e se eles não substituem uns aos outros, não é, certamente, vai haver uma sobreposição entre eles.

MacMullin explica:

"Eu gosto do que Ethereum está fazendo em um monte de níveis diferentes. Enquanto isso, há algum processo revolucionário acontecendo com Bitcoin. No entanto, ambas as moedas estão ainda em fase muito precoce do seu desenvolvimento, ambos são dinheiro ainda experimental e são pequenas. Se você colocar todos os cryptocurrencies na mesma cesta, no conjunto, vai valer menos de US $ 13-14 bilhões -. Você não pode realmente executar uma economia de um país com essa quantidade "

O que é dinheiro?

De acordo com MacMullin, uma boa moeda tem para oferecer três elementos: uma forte unidade de conta, meio de troca, e realmente um bom valor armazenado.

Ele elabora:

"Ethereum oferece uma forte unidade de conta e um meio de troca - a moeda é distribuída globalmente. Ambos Bitcoin e Ethereum são experiências muito interessantes. Eles estão expandindo significativamente escolhas de de que forma para guardar o seu dinheiro, e como a transaccionar. Mas o que é o lado ruim? Volatilidade é uma das maiores preocupações para todas as moedas digitais. E se falamos de valor armazenado, é apenas digital, não há nenhum elemento físico a ele. E é um desafio. "

O caso de Brexit

Na opinião de MacMullin, assim como moedas tradicionais, moedas digitais são muito dependente do que está acontecendo nas arenas políticas e económicas. Uma vez que eles são considerados principalmente para ser alternativas mais eficientes para moedas tradicionais, eles têm que ser mais sensível aos desafios, eles têm que oferecer algo mais.

Portanto, a questão aqui é como ampliar, como ir de onde você está agora para a próxima fase? questões importantes que acontecem com moedas fiat são, neste caso, a condução moedas digitais ainda mais, e é um grande benefício.

MacMullin partilhou a sua opinião sobre Brexit, o que certamente tem implicações para o mercado financeiro, que já são visíveis.

Ele diz para CoinTelegraph: BitGold

"Eu não acho que Brexit de alguma forma afetar FinTech de uma forma que vai fora do Reino Unido. É um mercado muito forte. Londres, Nova York, Hong Kong - são os três maiores capitais do FinTech e eu não acho que isso vai mudar durante a noite. O valor das moedas pode explorar a necessidade ou o desejo das pessoas de se afastar das moedas fiat ".

Em sua opinião, moedas digitais vai se tornar mais atraente para as pessoas, neste caso, eo interesse por eles vai certamente aumentar, como eles estão oferecendo melhores meios de transacionar e uma melhor reserva de valor.

While the fintech world is yet to see the implications of the DAO hack and Brexit, CoinTelegraph attended MoneyConf in Madrid to collect expert opinions on the future of money. In-between the inspirational keynotes and thought-provoking panel discussions CoinTelegraph had a chat with Darrel MacMullin, CEO of BitGold.

MoneyConf is an invite-only event organized by experts behind Web Summit, the world’s fastest growing technology event, and focused on the future of finance. This year more than 1500 decision makers from across the industry, including over 100 exhibiting startups looking to revolutionize the industry came to sunny Madrid.

Challenges of digital currencies

MacMullin says to CoinTelegraph about the DAO attack:

“It is exciting to see what is going on with different cryptocurrencies. The situation around the DAO hack and how serious this is, is still rather unclear. Many conventional systems have been hacked many times. Take, for instance, the Swift system which was hacked a few times last year. The biggest concern here is of course the reputation and gaining of trust, if you are trying to build a currency and make people use it as a primary currency making them invest in it.”

The fact that in the case of digital currencies you are dealing with just the digital ledger and digital token is rather challenging. Any attack to the ledger is therefore putting all the system at great risk. The other downside of digital currencies, as mentioned by Darrell, is that all transactions are anonymous which makes it difficult to resolve the problem if something goes wrong.



Closed loop private ledger

BitGold offers a platform for buying, selling, or redeeming gold using BitGold’s Aurum payment and settlement technology.

MacMullin explains:

“At BitGold and GoldMoney, one of the benefits we have is that we are dealing with the physical gold. We have built a digital ledger and it is a closed loop private ledger. Even if we were to get hacked our system has a capability to reverse all the paths. Even if someone was to get in and mess around with the ledger we still have all the physical gold.”

The ledger is being backed up constantly and every time someone buys gold using BitGold platform a special serialized barcode is dedicated to it.

According to MacMullin, the system is highly secure and it is almost impossible to hack it, “unless there is a simultaneous physical attack along with the digital attack on the ledger, but it is very unlikely,” he says.

Ethereum vs Bitcoin

There was an opinion that Ethereum will eventually replace Bitcoin, however the DAO attack has caused some doubts concerning the future of Ethereum and its ability to take on a leading position.

MacMullin shares his view:

“I don’t think this attack will put an end to Ethereum. It is certainly a blow in trust, however, I think that the community behind Ethereum responded more than correctly - they are getting behind it trying to resolve the issue and put Ethereum in place.”

In his view, the race between Ethereum and Bitcoin is not about one replacing the other. Both currencies have their support communities, which are rather large, and if they do not replace each other, there is certainly going to be an overlap between them.

MacMullin explains:

“I like what Ethereum is doing on a whole bunch of different levels. Meanwhile, there is some revolutionary process going on with Bitcoin. However, both currencies are still at the very early stage of their development, they are both still experimental money and are tiny. If you put all cryptocurrencies in one basket, altogether they will be worth less than $13-14 billion - you can’t really run a one country economy with this amount.”

What is money?

According to MacMullin, a good currency has to offer three elements: a strong unit of account, a medium of exchange, and a really good stored value.

He elaborates:

“Ethereum offers a strong unit of account and a medium of exchange - the currency is distributed globally. Both Bitcoin and Ethereum are very interesting experiments. They are significantly expanding choices of in what form to store your money, and how to transact. But what’s the downside? Volatility is one of the biggest concerns for all digital currencies. And if we speak about stored value, it is just digital, there is no physical element to it. And it is a challenge.”

The case of Brexit

In MacMullin’s opinion, just like traditional currencies, digital currencies are very dependent on what is going on in the political and economic arenas. Since they are mostly considered to be more efficient alternatives to traditional currencies, they have to be more responsive to challenges, they have to offer something more.

So, the question here is how to scale up, how to get from where you are now to the next stage? Major issues happening with fiat currencies are, in this case, driving digital currencies further, and it is a great benefit.

MacMullin shared his opinion on Brexit, which certainly has implications for the financial market, which are already visible.

He says to CoinTelegraph: BitGold

“I don’t think that Brexit will somehow affect fintech in a way it will go outside the UK. It is a very strong market. London, New York, Hong Kong - are the three biggest capitals of fintech and I don’t think this is going to change overnight. The value of currencies might exploit the need or the desire of people to move away from the fiat currencies.”

In his opinion, digital currencies will become more attractive for people in this case, and the interest in them will certainly rise, as they are offering better means of transacting and a better store of value.

In a bid to thwart the latest exploitation of The DAO’s smart contract code, developer Alex Van de Sande, lead designer for the Ethereum Foundation announced on Twitter that the Ethereum development community were moving funds away from The DAO after reports on social media highlighted that funds were being drained from contracts on the network.

It was only a few days ago that news broke that millions of dollars worth of ether were taken from contracts on The DAO, sparking a heated debate as to what best action the owners of Ethereum can take.

Now, it seems as though the network is at the mercy of hackers again with reports emerging of a new alleged attack.

Proposal 59, Child DAO and Robin Hood group

In the first hack, this interactive command chain chart below highlights that Proposal 59 was the one that was hacked and the Child DAO resulting from it was where the ether went.

Get Free Etherium Now
Taking to social media, Van de Sande stated that since Friday he has been in contact with a group of people, known as ‘Robin Hood’, intent on replicating the attack to prevent anymore siphoning of ether.

“After some initial setbacks the group was able to infiltrate all open split proposals trying to identify the best one to execute,” he said. “The best candidate proposal ended up being number 78 because it didn’t have many stalkers and we had identified the curator.”

He went on to state that they currently only control three of the five accounts that split with them and that if anyone has information on who the other accounts are to get into contact so the funds can be protected.

Outpacing the attacker

While opinion on whether to fork or not was a divided issue within the Robin Hood group many were cagey about doing the white hat counter-attack simply because they believed it could be devastating for the recovery efforts on past hacks.

After detecting that a new attack was taking place, the group's hands were forced seeing them go forwards with the attack. While the attack was slow to begin with, after Van de Sande donated 100k DAO tokens the attacker subsequently picked up pace with more attackers joining in.

He says:  Get Free Etherium Now

“Some of the most efficient hackers were able to do up to 30 recursions with up to 200 ether moved in each. It became clear that if we didn’t do anything the DAO would be drained before anything could have been done.”

After the Robin Hood team touched base with some contacts known as ‘whales’, they were able to secure six million DAO tokens, enabling them to outpace the attacker.

The address used by the Ethereum developers in the Child DAO Robin Hood attack can be found here where it has amassed over seven million ethers, worth over $100m.

Funds from The DAO have also been sent here, but it’s unclear whether it’s involved with the alleged attack or with the Ethereum developer efforts where over $160k worth of ether has been collected.

Additionally, a third address here from The DAO funds has amassed just under $4 million.

What’s Next?

Over seven million ethers from the DAO are now being held in the Child DAO with the Robin Hood team holding the private keys of the curator; however, while they have reduced the risk from twenty thousand attackers down to two, they still need to identify those remaining two.



However, Van de Sande is hopeful for a refund contract. He says:

“As soon as that DAO matures, we will try to move all the funds in a refund contract that will be much simpler than The DAO was. Of course we still need to be very careful with that code and to analyze it for any possible exploit.”

Get Free Etherium Now

While there is still a lot of unaccounted ether on the main attacker DAO and copycat attacks, Van de Sande is adamant when he says that “most of the ether is now more secure…which will allow The DAO itself to buy tokens into the bad splits and attack them to recover or block the ether.”

The light at the end of the tunnel may be getting closer, but the debate surrounding The DAO is far from over.

The last century of financial regulation within the world’s largest economy, in the United States, has bred a literal treasure chest of regulatory bodies that look more like an alphabet soup than any cohesive form of governance.

It is difficult to tell if one made-up group of regulators are just created to boost national employment numbers, protect the proletariat, or to check another set of fact-checkers who guard a larger, established thiefdom.

Speaking of thiefdoms, private companies like The Federal Reserve, in association with federal organizations like the SEC and the Treasury Department have crafted a new annual report under a group name called the Financial Stability Oversight Council, or FSOC. This report focuses on the safety and overall health of the U.S. economic system and has done so for the past five years.

Negative fodder

This year, Bitcoin and its blockchain technology are featured under the inclusive section labeled “Potential Emerging Threats and Vulnerabilities.” To sample the report in its 161-page entirely, click here. In this small ebook of impending economic doom-and-gloom, this is what the cabal had to say about the new technology known in the report as “distributed ledgers," or blockchains:

“…..Although distributed ledger systems are designed to prevent reporting errors or fraud by a single party, some systems may be vulnerable to fraud executed through collusion among a significant fraction of participants in the system.”

When it comes to Bitcoin and what it brings to the table, the FSOC regulators found negative fodder to focus on, referring to the extended blockchain transaction confirmation times.

“For example, in recent months, Bitcoin trade confirmation delays have increased dramatically and some trade failures have occurred as the speed with which new Bitcoin transactions are submitted has exceeded the speed with which they can be added to the blockchain.”

Bitcoin is at Gandhi's stage 3

While it is clear that Bitcoin is no perfect financial panic at the present time, after just seven years serving the world, I would need a few thousand paragraphs to go over the economic errors and strife U.S. regulators and organizations have committed in the same timespan, after a couple of centuries of practice. This report is itself a sample form of a mea culpa of economic issues facing the U.S. both now and in the future.

Time for a rhetorical question. Does anyone remember the time when Bitcoin was beneath the scope of the mainstream media, much less U.S. national economic threat reports?

This annual report certainly did not mention Bitcoin, or its blockchain technology, 3-4 years ago. Yet, in 2016, they must be included, in their own section, no less.

This is no glowing review of Bitcoin and its underlying technology, like the one the Bank of England produced last fall. It seems designed to be more of a more common operational scare tactic for government officials. Alas, you know what they say, “There is no such thing as bad publicity.”

The steady progress Bitcoin continues to make into the greater mainstream of macroeconomics reminds me of the famous quote by Mahatma Gandhi. It goes: “First, they ignore you. Then, they laugh at you. Then, they fight you. Then, you win!” Bitcoin seems to be deep into Stage 3 of this natural progression towards its ultimate acceptance.

The mysterious braggadocio, and ultimately debunked, ‘Bitcoin creator’ Craig Wright may not be Satoshi Nakamoto, but he is ambitious enough to be a Blockchain technology king.

It appears that Wright has been working on building a patent-based Bitcoin Blockchain empire. With the banking industry becoming so enamored with Blockchain technology of late, Wright may have found a backdoor to the ego-stroking success he seeks.

Will it pay off for Wright?

According to information obtained by Reuters, since February Wright has filed more than 50 patent applications in Britain through Antigua-registered EITC Holdings Ltd. This has been confirmed with unnamed sources who are said to be close to Wright, who has stopped doing interviews and media stunts since his bid to be seen as ‘Bitcoin’s creator’ failed to come to fruition.

"It looks like he is trying to patent the fundamental building blocks of any Blockchain, cryptocurrency, or distributed ledger system," said Antony Lewis, a Bitcoin consultant used by Reuters to review the filing documentation.

The time-consuming process of obtaining a patent can take several years, but could pay off for Wright in the long run, given the banking industry’s appetite for all things Blockchain-related.

What are those 400 patents Wright is filing?

Over $1 billion is being spent this year on Blockchain capital investment. There are many efficiencies not currently present within the current banking system that this new technology could provide, and it is obvious that Wright is looking to capitalize on them, if not actually invent them. Through EITC Holdings, Wright is rumored to be in the process of filing as many as four hundred patents related to Blockchain technology.

Andrew O’Hagan, who seems to have bought-in on chronicling Wright as ‘Satoshi Nakamoto,’ says that Wright may make more patent filings than that, and may be in line for a return of in excess of $1 billion USD.

Patents that Wright has applied for range from a mechanism for paying securely for online content to an operating system for running an ‘internet of things’ on the Blockchain.

Bitcoin billionaire wannabe

Craig Wright spent the first quarter of 2016 trying to convince the Bitcoin community that he was the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. As we covered, he stated that he would provide further proof that he was Satoshi Nakamoto by moving one of the earliest Bitcoins known to belong to Nakamoto.

After putting all his eggs in that basket, and being discredited on forums and blogs everywhere for even attempting that avenue of cryptographic proof, Wright’s website published a ‘goodbye’ apology, as he tried to back out of his hoax with some dignity intact. It looks like his ‘goodbye’ only came in the form of his aspiration to be the accepted creator of Bitcoin. His ambitions to be a Bitcoin billionaire, attempting to patent technology he may or may not have created, seem to have only just begun.